Read KIPP Houston Public Schools, Case 9, pages C-97 through C-111.
For this case analysis, you should prepare a written analysis of 3 to 5 pages that uses the text and other credible sources as appropriate. Your paper should have 1″ margins, be double spaced, and use APA formats for
- topic and subtopic headings
- citations
- references
Your case must minimally address the following issues / questions:
- Summarize the organizational strengths and core competencies which distinguish KIPP Houston from its competitors. Does the new regional structure advance or interfere with the goals of the organization?
- What are the weaknesses of KIPP Houston’s internal operations? Compare the organization’s performance to the achievements of its competitors. What steps have been taken to manage its problem areas?
- Describe the factors in the external environment which affect the charter organization’s ability to meet its objectives. Discuss KIPP Houston’s current expansion goals.
- Describe and consider Ali’s strategic posture on the major issues facing KIPP Houston. Based on your analysis, do you agree with her judgment? What additional recommendations can you make to guide the organization’s strategy and actions?
This is an individual assignment. It is due no later than 11:59 PM CT Sunday.
Rubric
Kipp Houston Public Schools
Kipp Houston Public Schools
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of internal strengths and core competencies
|
| 6.0 pts
Superior: Exceeds expectations and thoughtfully assesses the potential impact of the expanding regional structure.
|
5.0 pts
Proficient: Analysis thoroughly describes the relevant strengths and core competencies which distinguish KIPP Houston from its competitors.
|
4.0 pts
Competent: Analysis includes significant strengths and core competencies which distinguish KIPP Houston from its competitors.
|
2.0 pts
Needs Improvement: Analysis excludes some of the relevant strengths and core competencies which distinguish KIPP Houston from its competitors.
|
|
6.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of internal weaknesses
|
| 6.0 pts
Exceeds expectations, fully exploring and recognizing competitor achievements which impact KIPP’s success in the marketplace.
|
5.0 pts
Analysis thoroughly describes KIPP Houston’s internal weaknesses and demonstrates a full understanding of the steps being taken to overcome them.
|
4.0 pts
Analysis includes significant weaknesses of KIPP Houston’s internal operations and the steps being taken to manage these weaknesses.
|
2.0 pts
Analysis excludes some of the weaknesses of KIPP Houston’s internal operations and/or the steps being taken to manage these weaknesses.
|
|
6.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of external environmental conditions
|
| 6.0 pts
Exceeds expectations and provides an outstanding critique of the organization’s current expansion goals.
|
5.0 pts
Analysis fully and accurately describes the external factors which affect the organization’s ability to meet its objectives.
|
4.0 pts
Analysis describes external factors which affect the organization’s ability to meet its objectives.
|
2.0 pts
Analysis fails to describe some of the external factors which affect the organization’s ability to meet its objectives
|
|
6.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStrategic intent and recommendations
|
| 7.0 pts
Exceeds expectations and offers extraordinary suggestions to guide the organization’s strategy and actions.
|
6.0 pts
Response fully considers Ali’s strategic posture on major issues facing KIPP Houston, citing her experience, training, and body of results to credit her judgment.
|
5.0 pts
Response considers Ali’s strategic posture on major issues facing KIPP Houston.
|
3.0 pts
Response does not fully consider Ali’s strategic posture on major issues facing KIPP Houston.
|
|
7.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Writing, APA Format
|
| 5.0 pts
Information is appropriately sequenced with topical headings and subheadings. Language use, grammar, spelling, and punctuation are at an appropriate graduate level, with no errors. Uses paragraph form with topical sentences that are supported by the remainder of the paragraph, and effective transitions. Writing is clear, concise, and in correct voice and tense. Correct application of APA format. NO errors in citations and references.
|
4.0 pts
Information is appropriately sequenced with topical headings. Language use, grammar, spelling, and punctuation are at an appropriate graduate level. Uses paragraph form with topical sentences that are supported by the remainder of the paragraph. Writing is clear and concise. Somewhat correct application of APA format. Two to three errors in citations and references.
|
3.0 pts
There is some order to the information with some heading usage. Presentation has two to four misspellings or grammar errors, or two or three word use errors. Uses paragraph form but sentences within the paragraph may not be related. Somewhat correct application of APA format. Four to six errors in citations and references.
|
1.0 pts
Limited structure or no topical headings used. Presentation has more than four misspellings or grammar errors, or more than four word use errors. Language use makes it difficult to understand the intended meaning. Incorrect application of APA format. Several errors in or missing citations and references.
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 30.0
|
