what I need is a response to these 3 people. This is not so much correcting their mistakes like punctuations etc, but if they did not answer a question that is ok to point out.
HERE IS WHAT TO DO:
Provide additional info to what they have already and questions to the other people can be included. an example for a question..–>. ( I see you wrote this, do you feel it should be this way or this way?) understand?.. The questions aren’t necessary, but it challenges them to respond back to me if they like.
THIS IS 3 DIFFERENT RESPONSES TO CLASSMATES AND EACH RESPONSE SHOULD BE 150 WORDS MINIMUM AND HAVE AT LEAST ONE APA REFERENCE AND INCLUDE IN TEXT CITATION
** being that there is 2 questions they are responding to, you can provide additional info to one or BOTH questions. It can be combined,(if you choose to respond to both questions just let them know which one, like “in regards to question 2…etc… and so on) but the word requirement is at least 150 words. So total it will be at least 450 for all three people.
THE TOPIC– here are the original questions that these 3 people are responding to…
1. Select a more recent Supreme Court decisions (less than 2 years old) that had a significant impact on law enforcement. What are the facts of the case and what are the impacts of the decision on the police administrator?
2. Describe the relationship between the police agency/police administrator and the media. In what ways are there conflicts? In what ways are there partnerships?
I will include my response to the questions as well, if you would like to see what i responded with to the original 2 questions
YOU ARE TO DO THE FEEDBACK FOR 1-CAUSEY, 2-DUFOR, 3-DEATER ( NO PARTICULAR ORDER)