Legal Paper on Patty Plaintiff Lawsuit Claim

NO PLAGIARISM

ORIGINAL THOUGHTS ONLY

PLEASE FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS


In this assignment, you’ll need to decide whether Patty Plaintiff has any legal claims arising from a series of unfortunate events. After reading the scenario, answer the questions that follow, making sure to fully explain the basis of your decision.

Patty Plaintiff is shopping at her favorite store, Cash Mart. She is looking for a new laptop, but she can’t find one she likes. Then, realizing that she is going to be late for an appointment, she attempts to leave the store, walking very fast. However, before she can leave, she is stopped by a security guard who accuses her of shoplifting. Patty, who has taken nothing, denies any wrong doing. The officer insists and takes Patty to a small room in the back of the store. The guard tells Patty that if she attempts to leave the room she will be arrested and sent to jail. At this point, the guard leaves the room. Patty is scared and waits in the room for over an hour until the manager comes in and apologizes and tells Patty that she is free to go.

About this same time, Gerry Golfer is hitting golf balls in his backyard. Gerry decides to break out his new driver and hits a golf ball out of his backyard into the Cash Mart parking lot. The golf ball hits Patty Plaintiff on the head and knocks her unconscious just as she is leaving the store.

Five days later, after recovering from her injuries, Patty returns to work at Acme Corporation. Unfortunately, she used her company email to send her mom a personal email about her injury despite being aware that Acme’s company policy prohibits use of company email for personal communication. Patty’s supervisor, Barry Bossley, discovers Patty’s violation and Patty is reprimanded. When Patty goes home she uses her personal computer to post disparaging comments about her boss and Acme Corporation on social media. The next day Patty is fired from her job.

In a 6-10 paragraph paper, answer the following question: What types of legal claims could Patty make against Cash Mart, Gerry, and Acme Corporation? Consider the following:

    1. What are the possible tort claims that Patty can make against Cash Mart? Discuss the elements of the claim and how those elements relate to the facts in the scenario.
    2. Was Gerry negligent when he hit the golf ball that injured Patty? Discuss the elements of negligence and use facts from the scenario to support your decision.
    3. Does Patty have a right to privacy when using Acme Corporation’s e-mail system? Discuss the elements of the claim and how those elements relate to the facts in the scenario.
    4. Can Patty be legally fired from her job for making negative comments about her boss and her company on social media? Discuss the elements of the claim and how those elements relate to the facts in the scenario.

You will create and submit your assignment by using the ecree link above. Just click on the link and start writing. Your work will be saved automatically. When you’re finished writing, click “Submit” to turn in your paper.

Click here for the grading rubric.

SNHU Social Welfare and Sustainability Programs Paper

In this project, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following competencies:

  • Recommend operations management methods and techniques to increase value for customers
  • Evaluate how operations management generates value for an organization
  • Explain local, national, and global sustainability in relation to functional areas of business

Scenario

You work as the chief supply-chain officer at the large international corporation, NationaliTeas. NationaliTeas manufactures and sells tea worldwide. Its motto is “Keeping people and their taste buds awake (when they want to be awake).” Its mission is “Make the world more awake through rejuvenating and refreshing beverages and sustainable practices that uplift workers, communities, and souls.” Its vision is “to be the most respected tea manufacturer across at least three continents for our tea and our actions, which will be driven by a commitment ethical sourcing, minimal waste, and empowerment of our employees.”

You would like to establish an operational goal of having your corporation apply for a B Corp Certification within the next two years. You believe this would add value to the organization and help it to prioritize a stronger focus on sustainable operational practices. You have conducted a preassesment based on the recommendations for applying for B Corp Certification, and you’ve evaluated the corporation’s current strengths and areas for improvement.

Now you need to develop a proposal for the board of directors that explains why prioritizing the triple bottom line (TBL) through working toward B Corp Certification has organizational value. You must also propose three high-impact initiatives to help strengthen the corporation’s commitment to people, planet, and profit based on your evaluations.

Directions

  1. Part One: Justification of Benefits: Justify the value of working toward more intentionally incorporating the TBL framework into organizational decision making, specifically how ethical business practices regarding people, planet, and profit can benefit society, the environment, and the company’s profit. Specifically, address the following:
    1. Key Components: Explain the three key components of the TBL framework and how each component benefits businesses and society.
    2. Organizational Value: Provide a justification regarding the value and benefits of using the TBL framework to inform corporate decision making, and explain connections between the organizational mission and the organizational vision.
    3. B Corporation Benefits: Briefly describe the organizational benefits of attaining B Corp Certification.
  2. Part Two: Operational Recommendations: Read through the Preassessment Evaluation Summary (located in the Supporting Materials section) for each aspect of the TBL (people, profit, and planet). You will need to provide a detailed description of the initiatives that will create the needed improvement. You should note the organizational and societal value of the initiative along with the operational management techniques recommended to plan and complete each initiative. For each of your three initiatives, address the following:
    1. Organizational Impacts: Describe the organizational benefits of each initiative, specifically noting the expected positive impact of completing each. Examples of positive impacts include better alignment to the organization’s mission, vision, and culture statements; increased amounts of funds or resources saved; and improvements to the organization’s brand.
    2. Societal Impacts: Describe the societal benefits of each initiative, specifically noting the expected positive impact of completing each. Examples of positive impacts include increased community building and positive environmental impact.
    3. Customer Impacts: Describe the consumer benefits of each selected initiative, specifically noting the expected positive impact of completing each. Examples of positive impacts include increased alignment to target markets, improved product access and availability, and improved customer satisfaction.
    4. Business Risks: Explain the business risks associated with prioritizing, planning, and resourcing each initiative and how these risks will be considered and monitored.
    5. Operational Management Techniques: Recommend an operational management strategy or technique (e.g., project management, lean manufacturing, or Six Sigma) that is appropriate to implement for each selected initiative, and explain why.
    6. Defining Requirements and Scope: Define the requirements for the successful implantation of each selected initiative as well as the scope of each. Describe how changes to the requirements and scope would impact timelines, budget, and risk.
    7. Roles and Responsibilities: Explain the key internal and external stakeholders who would be involved in planning and implementing each selected initiative, as well as why each identified stakeholder is needed to successfully implement the initiatives.

​Discussion: Qualitative Designs for DBA Research, business and finance homework help

Discussion: Qualitative Designs for DBA Research

During the first course of this program, you considered your “why” for beginning your doctoral program and began exploring what it means to be an independent scholar who conducts research in the field of business. As you continue to plan for your Doctoral Study, keep in mind that one of your objectives should be to think and function in an action-oriented manner, so business owners and leaders can apply your research findings in practice. Consider what it means to conduct research that will effect change in everyday business practice.

As a doctoral independent scholar, you are undoubtedly concerned with the time and cost associated with conducting your research. Therefore, a thorough understanding of the variances between the case study and phenomenological research designs is valuable to your decision of selecting an appropriate research design, taking into consideration time, cost, and appropriateness to your applied research question.

To prepare for this Discussion, review this week’s Required Readings and consider the similarities and differences between case study and phenomenological research designs. Be sure to focus on the benefits of case study design in terms of time and cost within the context of DBA doctoral research.

By Day 3

Post an assessment of case study design versus phenomenological research design for doctoral research. Your assessment should include the following:

  • Compare and contrast case study and phenomenological research designs, including commitments of time and cost for each design.
  • Explain the benefits of using a case study for DBA doctoral research, including an example from scholarly research that supports your assertion.

Be sure to support your work with a minimum of two specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and one or more additional scholarly sources.

Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2015). Research methods for business students (7th ed.). Essex, England: Pearson Education Unlimited.

  • Chapter 5, Section 5.5, “Choosing a Research Strategy or Strategies” (pp. 177–200)
  • Chapter 6, Section 6.2, “Issues Associated with Gaining Traditional Access” (pp. 222–226)
  • Chapter 10, Section 10.2, “Types of Interview and Their Link to the Purpose of Research and Research Strategy” (pp. 390–393)

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Chapter 2, “Designing Case Studies: Identifying Your Case(s) and Establishing the Logic of Your Case Study” (pp. 49–67)

Boblin, S. L., Ireland, S., Kirkpatrick, H., & Robertson, K. (2013). Using Stake’s qualitative case study approach to explore implementation evidence-based practice. Qualitative Health Research, 23, 1267–1275. doi:10.1177/1049732313502128

Verbal Judo

Verbal Judo is a communication style used to deal with people who are in a highly emotional state.

For this discussion, please review the video below.

In the Line of Duty: Verbal Judo I Volume 5 Program 2

For your initial post, explain why you think verbal judo is an effective or ineffective tool for the role of an officer. Support your argument with at least four specific reasons.

For your response post, comment on at least two peers’ post that is opposite of the belief you provided for your initial post. Include at least two resources that support your rebuttal to your peers.

Due dates for your initial and response posts can be found by checking the Course Syllabus and Course Calendar.

Need Help? Click here for complete discussion forum instructions.

Saint Marys University Foreign Expert Invitation Letter Business Case Study

Attached please find the Term assignment question. Instructions are included. You need to answer all questions based on the fact scenario provided below, I uploaded the specific requirements and content to the word document.

Deliverable Length: 400-600 words

Primary Discussion Response is due by Friday (11:59:59pm Central), Peer Responses are due by Tuesday (11:59:59pm Central).

Part 1

Having experienced a robust debate discussion regarding if these two laws should be flexible, it is time to shift gears a bit and consider the broader implications of changing laws from an ethical and philosophical perspective. Read this article to frame this week’s discussion. Complete the following:

  • What is your initial perspective after reading the article?
  • Based on your review of the article, is there an ethical/philosophical consideration that supports/ challenges the article’s considerations?

Part 2: Based on the first initial of your last name:

  • First initial M-Z: provide an argument ‘FOR’ there being an ethical/philosophical reasoning for changing laws. Submit your position by posting in the Unit 2 Debate forum, under the ‘FOR’ topic.
  • First initial A-L: provide an argument ‘AGAINST’ there being an ethical/philosophical reasoning for changing laws. Submit your position by posting in the Unit 2 Debate forum, under the ‘AGAINST’ topic.

In both considerations, provide research that supports your assertions.

Responses to Other Students: Review the opposing thread comments. Respond to at least two of your classmates in the opposing thread with at least a 100-word reply about their Primary Task Response regarding items you found to be compelling and enlightening.

For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.

Howard College Engineering Ethical Responsibility Article Discussion

Read the article and answer the questions please!

word document has the articles but PPTs are for you to know more about the subject!

PJM 6620 NU Wk 2 Design Thinking Process Bartender Work Desire Discussion

Design thinking deliverables on your career journey – you are the customer. Define the problem statement, using your profile/character find a job posting and complete an empathy map and develop a profile of an ideal candidate by reviewing your resume, how would you substitute, rearrange, eliminate and adapt your current resume
Include discovery interview questions, user needs assessment, Point of view (POV) and asking questions.
*Empathy map – the package states 2 empathy maps – I’m happy with you just providing 1 empathy map of that employer.

For this assignment, you will work to create key design thinking deliverables: Your Week 1-2 deliverables include:

o User Profile Canvas/ Persona (Pains, Gains, Jobs-to-be-done, Use Cases)

o Empathy Map (2 maps)

o Discovery Interview Questions

o User Needs through Needfinding (self-conducted)

o Point of View (POV) with explanation of each POV

o Idea Poster

o Prototype method and justification

Title of the selected case, law homework help

While working an undercover detail in a neighborhood known for drug activity, you notice a vehicle stopped at the intersection waiting for the light to change. The man in the vehicle makes eye contact with you. You approach his vehicle and begin carrying on a conversation with him. You ask him if he needs anything, and he responds by asking you, “What do you have?” You ask him what he is looking for, and he tells you he is looking to score. You show him a small bag containing a white powdery substance; he asks how much, and you respond, “20 dollars.” He hands you a $20 bill, and you give him the bag and tip your hat to signal that the transaction was completed. At this time, the man drives off and is stopped a block away by a marked unit. The individual is placed under arrest for drug possession and purchasing drugs, and he is taken to jail.

The individual is charged with possession of a controlled substance. At his trial, he claimed that he was a victim of entrapment by the police. He was found guilty and sentenced to serve 5 years in jail and given credit for the 3 months he already had served in jail.

Assignment Guidelines

  • Research and provide 2 case briefs on specific case law related to the entrapment defense as it may or may not apply in the case scenario.
    • Your case briefs should follow this format:
      • Title: Title of the selected case
      • Facts: Summary of the events, court timeline, evidence, and so forth
      • Issues: Issues that were present in this case
      • Decisions: The court’s decision and the conclusion to the case
      • Reasoning: The rationale behind the final decision
      • Dissenting opinions: Any dissenting opinions, and an explanation of what they were and why they were raised

Stalking (POST)

Read Waldon v. State on pages 373-375.

Answer the three “Questions for Discussion” at the bottom of page 375.