Hca

Even the smartest students need writing assistance at some point during their academic career. Should you lock yourself in a room and spend the entire weekend trying to write a paper? We promise you that the paper that you pay for won’t be resold or submitted elsewhere. It will also be written according to the instructions that you and your professor provide. Our excellent essays stand out among the rest for a reason. Don’t just take our word, check them out by yourself.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Need help with Hw question 

Organizational Evaluation

[WLOs: 2, 3] [CLOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

Prior to beginning work on this assignment, read Chapters 10 and 11 from the textbook, review earlier chapters in the textbook as needed along with the instructor guidance from this week as well as previous weeks. Additionally, review the following:

·

What Goes Into a PEST Analysis for Healthcare?

 (Links to an external site.)

·

Intellectual Capital

 (Links to an external site.)
 by Investopedia

·
Strategic Planning for a Financial Turnaround (Links to an external site.)

For your 
final paper

  Download final paper, you will continue with the same organization you chose for the Week 3 SWOT analysis, which addressed one of the following health care organizations:

· CHRISTUS Trinity Mother Frances Health System

· Cleveland Clinic

· Henry Ford Health System

· Lutheran Services in America

· Mayo Clinic

· Medtronic

· Shriners Hospitals for Children

· Jude Children’s Research Hospital

· Stanford Medical Center

· Trinity Health

· UC Davis Medical Center

· University hospital or other nonprofit hospital in your community

· University of Texas Health (UT Health)

· Veteran’s Health Administration (VHA)

Information search tips:

Search the organization’s name on the internet. Open the homepage of the organization. Select the links for the different pages, usually located at the top of the webpage or in the footer. In addition, you can enter the organization’s name and the topic in the search box. Additional tips are included below in the assignment directives.

For additional guidance, review the following resources:

·

What Is CRAAP? A Guide to Evaluating Web Sources

 (Links to an external site.)

·

Advanced Internet Search Techniques

 (Links to an external site.)

·

Keywords Are Critical

 (Links to an external site.)

 

Conduct an evaluation of the organization based on strategic planning analysis. Your 
evaluation of the organization’s strategic plan

  Download evaluation of the organization’s strategic planmust include the following:

· Analyze the internal environment.

· Identify at least two internal problems associated with the organization and explain the rationale. Examples may include

· Patient experience

· Internet search keywords: organization name + patient reviews

· Telehealth availability

· Limited marketing

· Delayed payments for billed services

· Cybersecurity

· Internet search keywords: organization name and security breach or cybersecurity or ransomware attack

· Price transparency

· Health care staffing shortages

· Analyze the external environment.

· Examine all the following external issues that can impact the organization’s ability to meet the Mission, Vision, and Values and the goals identified in the strategic plan:

· Political

· Economic

· Social

· Technological

· Environmental

· Legal

· Evaluate the competitive advantage of the organization.

· Explain what the organization does that no other organization in the community or region does. Examples may include

· Differentiation from competitors in the community

· Reputation

· Superior location (e.g., Consider the income of the area and who the consumers are likely to be based on the location.)

· Customer satisfaction

· Convenience

· Price level

· Examine the role of stakeholders (address at least three of the following):

· Government

· Accrediting bodies

· Insurance providers

· Patients

· Licensed professionals

· Other health care organizations (e.g., competitors and partners)

· Large employers in the area (e.g., up- or downsizing in number of employees and how that affects the health care organization, or employer needs for specialized care providers)

· Assess the services provided (address at least three of the following):

· New or innovative services or products

· Renowned health care providers (e.g., a doctor who has special expertise or experience)

· Availability of financial support for qualifying patients (e.g., Medicare, Medicaid, financial assistance opportunities)

· Modern technology and equipment

· Equitable care that ensures a fair distribution of care among all individuals in the community and is culturally competent (Tip: Evaluate the mission, vision, and values statements to determine the organization’s position on equitable and culturally competent care).

· Analyze the organization’s competencies and resources.

· Intellectual capital (choose two)

· Professional competency (e.g., highly qualified and credentialed health care workers)

· Information systems and data management

· Contracts with state or federal government (certified to provide care to patients using Medicare and Medicaid)

· Contracts with insurance providers (e.g., in- versus out-of-network costs to patients)

· Contracts with other organizations to provide care for employees (e.g., large employers in the community—see stakeholders segment above)

· Organizational competencies (choose two)

· Managing the continuum of care (e.g., maintaining contact with the patient over a long period of time and across health services to ensure they receive the best possible care)

· Training physicians and staff to ensure their skills, knowledge, and behaviors reflect current industry standards and best practices

· Review of strategic plans and altering the plans as needed (e.g., alternative strategies)

· Environmental scanning (e.g., benchmarking the services, skills, and work force against competitors)

· Create a recommendation for the future direction of the organization of choice. Based on the findings on the topics above, address the following:

· What recommendations can be made to ensure the organization manages future growth or continued success?

· What are the short-, medium-, and long-term changes that need to be considered?

· What does the organization need to do to maintain its financial health and viability?

The Organizational Evaluation final paper

· Must be a minimum of eight double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to 

APA Style

 (Links to an external site.)
 as outlined in the Writing Center’s 

APA Formatting for Microsoft Word

 (Links to an external site.)

 resource.

· Must include a separate title page with the following:

· Title of paper in bold font, which will include the organization’s name

· Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page.

· Student’s name

· Name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)

· Course name and number

· Instructor’s name

· Due date

· Must utilize academic voice. See the 

Academic Voice

 (Links to an external site.)
 resource for additional guidance.

· Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.

· For assistance on writing 

Introductions & Conclusions

 (Links to an external site.)
 and 

Writing a Thesis Statement

 (Links to an external site.)
, refer to the Writing Center resources.

· Must use at least five credible sources in addition to the course text.

· The 

Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources

 (Links to an external site.)
 table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source.

· To assist you in completing the research required for this assignment, view the 

Quick and Easy Library Research

 (Links to an external site.)
 tutorial, which introduces the University of Arizona Global Campus Library and the research process, and provides some library search tips.

· Must document any information used from sources in APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center’s 

APA: Citing Within Your Paper

 (Links to an external site.)

guide.

Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center. See the 

APA: Formatting Your References List

 (Links to an external site.)
 resource in the Writing Center for specifications.

Carefully review the 
Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.)
 for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

Reference:

Required Resources

Text

Spath, P. L., Abraham, S. C., & Mishek, J. H. (2022). 

Strategic management for healthcare organizations

 (2nd ed.). Zovio.

· Chapter 10: Summary, Evaluation, and Benefits of the Strategic Formulation Process

· Chapter 11: Ethics and Corporate Responsibility

· The full-text version of this ebook is available through the Constellation suite accessed through your online classroom, mobile app, or the 
Constellation
 (Links to an external site.)

 Chapter 10 discusses generating a strategy and improving existing strategies; and Chapter 11 discusses ethical behaviors, ethical dilemmas and coping approaches, and corporate responsibility for ethical behaviors. These chapters will assist you in your Ethical Considerations in Health Care discussion, the Week 5 Quiz, and the Organizational Evaluation final paper this week.

1

2

Organizational Evaluation

Your First and Last Name

The University of Arizona Global Campus

HCA421: Health Care Planning and Evaluation

Instructor’s Name

Due Date

Hint: For help completing this assignment, read:

· Chapter 10

· Chapter 11

· CTRL + Right Click:

What Goes Into a Pest Analysis for Healthcare?

· CTRL + Right Click:
Intellectual Capital

· CTRL + Right Click:
Strategic Planning for a Financial Turnaround

· CTRL + Right Click:
SWOT Analysis

Hint: Delete all hint boxes and section instructions before submitting the paper to your instructor. To delete the boxes: right-click on the edge of each box and press delete.

Organizational Evaluation Paper

Introduction

In this section, write a brief introduction to your paper that will allow your reader or listener to follow the organization of your paper and the focus of your content. You must provide the name of your organization in this segment. Be sure to write your evaluation paper on the same organization that you selected for your SWOT Analysis in Week 3. You might provide a brief overview of the topic(s) addressed throughout the assignment in your introduction.

Hint: Use evidence from your readings to support your ideas in the sections below.

CTRL + Right Click
QUOTING, PARAPHRASING, & SUMMARIZING
for help

Hint: CTRL +Right Click
INTRODUCTIONS & CONCLUSIONS
for help.

Analyze the Internal Environment

In this segment you will identify at least two internal problems associated with the organization and explain the rationale. You may choose topics from the list provided in your online classroom or other topics you locate through your research.

State Topic 1 Heading

Select one topic from the list or get approval from your instructor if you wish to cover a topic not include in the assignment directions.

State Topic 2 Heading

Select one topic from the list or get approval from your instructor if you wish to cover a topic not include in the assignment directions.

Analyze the External Environment

In this segment you will examine the external issues that can impact the organization’s ability to meet the Mission, Vision, and Values and the goals identified in the strategic plan.

Political

Examine political issues that can impact the organization’s ability to meet the Mission, Vision, and Values and the goals identified in the strategic plan.

Economic

Examine economic issues that can impact the organization’s ability to meet the Mission, Vision, and Values and the goals identified in the strategic plan.

Social

Examine social issues that can impact the organization’s ability to meet the Mission, Vision, and Values and the goals identified in the strategic plan.

Technological

Examine technological issues that can impact the organization’s ability to meet the Mission, Vision, and Values and the goals identified in the strategic plan.

Environmental

Examine environmental issues that can impact the organization’s ability to meet the Mission, Vision, and Values and the goals identified in the strategic plan.

Legal

Examine legal issues that can impact the organization’s ability to meet the Mission, Vision, and Values and the goals identified in the strategic plan.

Evaluate the Competitive Advantage of the Organization

In this segment you will explain what the organization does that no other organization within the community or region does. Some examples include differentiation from competitors, reputation, superior location, customer satisfaction, convenience, and price level.

Examine the Role of Stakeholders

In this segment you will examine the role of three stakeholder categories. The full list of categories is provided in your assignment directions in the online classroom. Some examples include government, accrediting bodies, patients, and insurance providers.

State Stakeholder 1 Heading

Examine the role of your first selected stakeholder.

State Stakeholder 2 Heading

Examine the role of your second selected stakeholder.

State Stakeholder 3 Heading

Examine the role of your third selected stakeholder.

Assess the Services Provided

In this segment you will assess the services provided by the organization. You must select three services from the list provided in your assignment directions in the online classroom. The list includes new or innovative services or products, renowned health care providers, financial support for qualifying patients, modern technology and equipment, and equitable care.

State Service 1 Heading

Assess your first selected service provided by the organization.

State Service 2 Heading

Assess your second selected service provided by the organization.

State Service 3 Heading

Assess your third selected service provided by the organization.

Analyze the Organization’s Competencies and Resources

In this segment you will analyze the organization’s intellectual capital and the organization’s competencies.

Intellectual Capital

Choose two forms of intellectual capital that are listed in your online classroom for your analysis.

State Intellectual Capital 1 Heading

Analyze your first selected intellectual capital of the organization.

State Intellectual Capital 2 Heading

Analyze your second selected intellectual capital of the organization.

Organizational competencies

Choose two forms of organizational capital that are listed in your online classroom for your analysis.

State Organizational Competency 1 Heading

Analyze your first selected organizational competency.

State Organizational Competency 2 Heading

Analyze your second selected organizational competency.

Create a Recommendation for the Future Direction of the Organization.

Recommendations for the Future

In this segment create recommendations based on your findings. What recommendations can be made to ensure the organization manages future growth or continued success? What are the short-term, medium-term, and long-term changes that need to be considered? What does the organization need to do to maintain its financial health and viability?


Hint: CTRL + Right Click

INTEGRATING RESEARCH
For help.

Hint: CTRL + Right Click
APA: CITING WITHIN YOUR PAPER
for help.

Conclusion

Briefly summarize the ideas that you discussed in your paper, explaining the significance of these ideas.

Hint: CTRL + Right Click
INTRODUCTIONS & CONCLUSIONS
for help.

References

Include five credible sources in addition to the course text in your assignment. Use APA format to cite and reference your sources on your References page. You MUST include in-text citations throughout your paper to show your reader what information you used from outside sources.

Template for an APA Academic Journal reference entry:

Author’s Last Name, Initials. (Year Published). Article title. Journal Name, volume #(Issue #),

page range. http://doi.org/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (article’s DOI entry)

Template for an APA Webpage (with a Person as Author) reference entry:

Author’s Last Name, Initials. (Year Published). Webpage title. Website Title. http://(URL)

Template for an APA Webpage (with Corporate/Government Author) reference entry:

Title of Organization. (Year Published). Webpage title. http://(URL)

Template for an APA eTextbook reference entry:

Author’s Last Name, Initials. (Year Published). Title of book: Subtitle of book (edition, if other

than the first). Publisher Name. https://doi.org/xxx.xxx.xxx (eBook’s DOI, or https://(URL) if DOI is unavailable)

Hint: CTRL + Right Click
FORMATTING YOUR REFERENCES LIST

for further help.

*In the final version of your assignment, be sure that you have removed all the hints (orange boxes) within the template as well as the directions.

1

2

SWOT Analysis

The University of Arizona Global Campus

HCA421: Health Care Planning and Evaluation

Joyce Williams

January 17, 2022

SWOT Analysis

Children’s Research Hospital St. Jude has a good reputation in the United States. State, especially the east coast. The Mission of St. Jude is “advancing the treatment and prevention of catastrophic illness in children through research and treatment.

Jude Children’s Research Hospital

Strengths

The facility has received numerous support from the community, one of the pillars of strength. For instance, most of its funding comes from American society. Additionally, the institution enjoys the levels of competent employees they can hire. According to Surapolchai at el. (2019), these employees have been able to help the institution in maintaining a good combination of scientific basics and patients care. Again the organization has played a significant role in strengthening by creating a strong cohesion among its employees or staff. Nevertheless, the institution has built a strong foundation by having a base of its scientist, medical practitioners, and patients.

Weaknesses

One of St. Jude’s weaknesses is that it has too much publicity. As a result, the tendency to ignore all of their promotions. Another weakness of St. Jude is that it is left to the donor only. As a charity, they rely on their donors and donors. If their donations fall, they can afford the technology and research to find a cure for children. Another weakness is that while technology is innovating rapidly, illness changes day by day. Rapid changes in the health of the children being treated can make it impossible to heal. Losing the children who fought to be cured is an unfortunate weakness and failure.

Opportunities

Perhaps the world’s most famous children’s children’s hospital, St. Jude, offers several unique opportunities. The ample opportunity lies in hospital technology. St. Jude uses techniques such as deep brain stimulation to provide an exceptional level of care that is rarely found anywhere else. This gives many people the opportunity to become the first-line treatment of choice. In addition, St. Jude is active in essential markets. The healthcare market is very sustainable. Leading companies like St. Jude can fill this niche and enjoy high sustainability potential. More importantly, the organization can make public expenditures. As Government plans to invest more money in healthcare, organizations like St. Jude’s directly benefited from this.

Threats

However, St. Jude faces a unique threat. One of its biggest and most dangerous threats is its reputation. Many healthcare companies have been victims of large-scale fraud allegations and other issues in recent years. This means that organizations like St. Jude are suffering from the problem of sinful associations. Unless they unleash it and restore a potentially damaged reputation, it will harm the entire business model in the long run. May affect. In addition, organizations are facing competition. Internationally, St. Jude has many competitors. According to Burki (2022), these competitors are trying to provide the same service to potential customers. In the long run, this can affect the market value of financial institutions. Finally, St. Jude may be under threat from government regulation. These regulations affect delivery, budget, Quality of care provided, and more. one must adapt continuously. Government intervention can be a blessing or burden for such organizations.

Summarize the details from the SWOT analysis by filling in the SWOT box below:

SWOT BOX

Strengths

Community support facilitates mutual integration

employees, doctors, scientists, and patients that help achieve the institution’s best outcome. Again the organization has played a significant role in strengthening by creating a strong cohesion among its employees or staff. Nevertheless, the institution has built a strong foundation by having a base of its scientist, medical practitioners, and patients.

Weaknesses

Rapid changes in health that rely solely on excessive advertising donations Children are treated. As a charity, they rely on their donors and donors. If their donations fall, they can afford the technology and research to find a cure for children.

Opportunities

Ability to attract customers through special care. Government growth of its expenditure on healthcare providers. Sustainability of need overall healthcare provider. The institution uses techniques such as deep brain stimulation to provide an exceptional level of care that is rarely found anywhere else. This gives many people the opportunity to become the first-line treatment of choice.

Threats

Changes in government regulations, Quality of care, and drug prices might alter the institution’s regular running. Associatively undermine the reputation of the provider, and therefore this company.

Mission and Vision

The organization’s mission will offer the best research to the new cancer genic understanding of different cancers and how they can be treated in different stages. It will not go in vain that the institution will be referred to as the epitome of medical research within the country. Still, at the same time, most of its internal management might end up messing around with the organization’s excellent reputation.

Internal Weaknesses

According to Spath at el. (2022), market behavior describes how people increase or decrease their spending based on the brand’s perception of the market. Consumers will notice when a product or service first hits the market. This can be achieved through various strategies that marketers can adopt to introduce their products. Examples of these strategies are mass media marketing or social media marketing, including TV ads, radio ads, and social media ads. Marketers try to get people’s attention by using strategies to reach prominent people. This is done to attract the attention of many people to goods and services. Marketers generate preferences as soon as consumers learn about a service or product.

External Threats

The health institution faces a serious outrange in prices of drugs, and the current Government might end up changing the legislation policies that might leave the institution vulnerable.

Conclusion

The hospitals support the community by providing free treatment for children with cancer and other illnesses. They are also conducting scientific research in clinical trials on patients and the best physicians and specialists available. St. Jude is a community partner because it shares its research with other organizations and countries. This article then goes into various subgroups where a hospital is part of a Scientific Research Facility. The hospital’s financial history shows that it does not accept donations from individuals. Instead, they rely on health insurance, government subsidies, and funding initiatives to supplement their income; the company then reinvests its profits.

References

Burki, T. K. (2022). WHO and St Jude Children’s Research Hospital announce childhood cancer medicines initiative. The Lancet Oncology23(1), e17.

Hay, A. (2022). First Person Profile: Melissa M. Hudson, MD: The director of the Division of Cancer Survivorship at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital believes that education for survivors is vital: The director of the Division of Cancer Survivorship at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital believes that education for survivors is vital. Cancer128(1), 11-12.

Spath, P. L., Abraham, S. C., & Mishek, J. H. (2022). 
Strategic management for healthcare organizations
 (2nd ed.). Zovio

Surapolchai, P., Anurathapan, U., Sermcheep, A., Pakakasama, S., Sirachainan, N., Songdej, D., … & Hongeng, S. (2019). Long-Term Outcomes of Modified St Jude Children’s Research Hospital Total Therapy XIIIB and XV Protocols for Thai Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia19(8), 497-505.

University of Arizona Global Campus. (2014, August 6). 

HCA421.W5A1.09.2021

Description:

Total Possible Score: 22.00

Analyzes the Internal Environment

Total: 2.00

Distinguished – Comprehensively analyzes the internal environment.

Proficient – Analyzes the internal environment. The analysis is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic – Minimally analyzes the internal environment. The analysis is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations – Attempts to analyze the internal environment; however, the analysis is significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance – The analysis of the internal environment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Analyzes the External Environment

Total: 2.00

Distinguished – Comprehensively analyzes the external environment.

Proficient – Analyzes the external environment. The analysis is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic – Minimally analyzes the external environment. The analysis is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations – Attempts to analyze the external environment; however, the analysis is significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance – The analysis of external the environment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Evaluates the Competitive Advantage of the Organization

Total: 3.00

Distinguished – Comprehensively and clearly evaluates the competitive advantage of the organization.

Proficient – Evaluates the competitive advantage of the organization. Minor details are missing or slightly unclear.

Basic – Minimally evaluates the competitive advantage of the organization. Relevant details are missing and/or unclear.

Below Expectations – Attempts to evaluate the competitive advantage of the organization; however, significant details are missing and unclear.

Non-Performance – The evaluation of the competitive advantage of the organization is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Examines the Role of Stakeholders

Total: 3.00

Distinguished – Thoroughly, clearly, and accurately examines the role of stakeholders. 

Proficient – Examines the role of stakeholders. Minor details are missing, slightly unclear, or inaccurate.

Basic – Minimally examines the role of stakeholders. Relevant details are missing, unclear, and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations – Attempts to examine the role of stakeholders; however, significant details are missing, unclear, and inaccurate.

Non-Performance – The examination of the role of stakeholders is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Assesses the Services Provided

Total: 3.00

Distinguished – Comprehensively and clearly assesses the services provided. 

Proficient – Assesses the services provided. Minor details are missing or slightly unclear.

Basic – Minimally assesses the services provided. Relevant details are missing and/or unclear. 

Below Expectations – Attempts to assess the services provided; however, significant details are missing and unclear.

Non-Performance – The assessment of the services provided is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Analyzes the Organization’s Competencies and Resources

Total: 3.00

Distinguished – Comprehensively analyzes the organization’s competencies and resources. 

Proficient – Analyzes the organization’s competencies and resources. The analysis is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic – Minimally analyzes the organization’s competencies and resources. The analysis is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations – Attempts to analyze the organization’s competencies and resources; however, the analysis is significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance – The analysis of the organization’s competencies and resources is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Creates a Recommendation for the Future Direction of the Organization of Choice

Total: 3.00

Distinguished – Creates a thorough, clear, and accurate recommendation for the future direction of the organization of choice.

Proficient – Creates a recommendation for the future direction of the organization of choice. Minor details are missing, slightly unclear, or inaccurate.

Basic – Creates a limited recommendation for the future direction of the organization of choice. Relevant details are missing, unclear, and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations – Attempts to create a recommendation for the future direction of the organization of choice; however, significant details are missing, unclear, and inaccurate.

Non-Performance – The recommendation for the future direction of the organization of choice is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Critical Thinking: Evidence

Total: 0.50

Distinguished – Employs persuasive and applicable information from credible sources to develop an ample analysis or synthesis of the topic. Viewpoints of experts are scrutinized thoroughly.

Proficient – Employs applicable information from credible sources to develop an analysis of the topic.

Basic – Identifies applicable information from credible sources, but may neglect the application of such information toward the analysis of the topic. 

Below Expectations – Presents information from external sources, but such information may lack credibility and/or relevance. Neglects to apply such information toward the analysis of the topic.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 0.50

Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. 

Basic – Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. 

Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Page Requirement

Total: 0.50

Distinguished – The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Proficient – The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Basic – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Below Expectations – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.   

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Resource Requirement

Total: 0.50

Distinguished – Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient – Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic – Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations – Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Powered by

Writerbay.net

Do you need help with this or a different assignment? In a world where academic success does not come without efforts, we do our best to provide the most proficient and capable essay writing service. After all, impressing professors shouldn’t be hard, we make that possible. If you decide to make your order on our website, you will get 15 % off your first order. You only need to indicate the discount code GET15.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper