Analyze how you fulfilled the following roles during your program:

• scientist

• detective

• manager of the healing environment

Discuss how you have grown professionally since the beginning of your program.

Reflect (suggested length of 1 page) on your professional definition of quality and safety developed in Professional Roles and Values, including any necessary changes to your definition.

a. Discuss how the program assisted you in developing your professional definition.

b. Identify the artifacts (ATTACHED –artifact 1) in your portfolio that support your definition.

c. Explain how these artifacts support your definition from part B1.

Discuss the importance of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) certificate for your future role as a professional nurse.

(the certificate is about IMPROVEMENT CAPABILITY, PATIENT SAFETY, LEADERSHIP, PERSON- AND FAMILY-CENTERED CARE, TRIPLE AIM FOR POPULATIONS, AND QUALITY, COST, AND VALUE)

1. Reflect (suggested length of 1 page) on your professional definition of evidence-based practice developed in Professional Roles and Values, including any necessary changes to your definition.

a. Discuss how the program assisted you in developing your professional definition.

b. Identify the artifacts (ATTACHED – artifact 2) in your portfolio that support your definition.

c. Explain how these artifacts support your definition from part C1.

2. Reflect (suggested length of 1 page) on your understanding of evidence-based practice and applied nursing research by doing the following:

a. Discuss how you are able to evaluate current primary research and apply the concepts to your nursing practice, considering the following:

• relevancy and believability of data

• differences between quality improvement and research (places and uses of each)

• differences between primary and secondary research and resources and the implications of each in clinical practice

b. Explain how your experience in the program helped you achieve excellence in evidence-based practice.

For this Assignment, you will write an essay as if you were Maritza, outlining a plan to work with one client.

In addition to running her group workshops for incarcerated women, Maritza also counsels most of the women individually. Maritza is planning to work with one client intensively, working on building parenting and self-efficacy skills in two one-on-one sessions each week for 6 months. Maritza would like to employ a single system research design to evaluate the effectiveness of this potential intervention.

1. Identify the most feasible research design for this intervention.
2. Explain your reasoning for choosing the design.
3. Discuss at least two practical or ethical constraints in your evaluation.
4. Discuss at least two threats to validity and how you could address these in your evaluation design.
5. Perform a web search to find a measurement tool that you believe would yield the best data for this type of research.
6. Explain why you think this tool will be helpful.

Assignment Guidelines

Explain your reasoning for choosing the design.

• A title page
• The body of the essay (1000–1200 words; the word count does not include the title or reference page)
• Use standard margins: 1″ on all sides
• Use standard 12-point font size, Times New Roman or Arial
• Use standard double-spacing
• Use left-aligned text, do not right-justify

Be sure to look at the grading rubric in the Syllabus to ensure that you have covered all of the expectations for the Assignment!

Your writing should be in Standard American English and be clear and specific with few errors.

This is for a paper that needs to be corrected/edited which needs to also be reapply to correct template (attached). Please see attached docs for info. I will send you ebook details upon acceptance

————————–

A Comparison and Contrast of Two Court Rulings

I have the sign in details for my ebook upon completion.

Course Assignments https://class.waldenu.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/USW1/202010_…

For this assignment, compare and contrast two instrumental court decisions (i.e., Tarasoff v. Regents of California (1976) and Estates of Morgan v. Fairfield Family Counseling Center (1997), both impacting confidentiality practices in the counseling profession. Discuss how the rulings impact clinical practice.

The Assignment (2–3 pages):

Compare and contrast the details of the Tarasoff v. Regents of California (1976) and Estates of Morgan v. Fairfield Family Counseling Center (1997) court decisions. Consider how these cases may be similar or how they may be different.

Describe how the court rulings relate to confidentiality in profession of counseling. Cite appropriate ethical codes to support your narrative.

Put on a ‘counselor hat’ and discuss how the rulings might clarify or make it more difficult for you as a clinician. Reflect upon your understanding of your responsibility to maintain confidentiality with a client.

Your paper should be in proper APA format with a minimum of 2-3 scholarly references. Use the readings, additional readings, course textbook and the court cases to support your stance, or any other related references you might find.

Class discussion on Chapter 5 (Requirements Life Cycle Management) in the BABOK.

• Your instructor will submit an actual requirement change to your project in class.
• As a group work through your change request process.
• If there are any missing items or additional clarification on the change, go back to the instructor.
• Contact your instructor using their official contact method.
• Be sure to find out (ask many questions) if this requirement is based on a need or a want.

• In your groups have a few members act as the Change Control Board to do the following:
• Assess the change
• Trace the requirement to learn the impact on the overall solution
• Prioritize the requirement among all the requirements
• When prioritizing the requirement, be sure to include:
• Cost
• Risk
• Penalty for not implementing
• Benefit for implementing
• Any dependencies to other requirements
• Time sensitivity
• Stability of the requirements
• Any compliance that needs to be met
• Work with the faculty member, as your stakeholder to get an understanding, agreement and approval of the requirement and the proposed design.
• Be sure to consider all stakeholders that will be affected by this change and include their approval in the proposed design.

• Before the end of the class, check with your faculty member for a change to your personal project.

• Submit the business case that the Change Control Board reviewed during class. Make sure it contains the following:
• Assessment of the change
• Trace the requirement to understand the impact this change will have on the overall solution
• Prioritize the requirement among all the requirements
• When prioritizing the requirement be sure to include:
• Cost
• Risk
• Penalty for not implementing
• Benefit for implementing
• Any dependencies to other requirements
• Time sensitivity
• Stability of the requirements
• Any compliance that needs to be met

Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you answer the following:

1. Discuss the importance of lawyers in American society and government. Be specific and provide examples.
   1. Be sure to address this question: Why have lawyers, from the early colonial years to the present, been so unpopular?
2. Describe the impact of stratification within the legal profession as it relates to the delivery and quality of legal services in the United States. Be specific and provide examples.
3. Examine the role of interest groups in the judicial process. Be specific and provide examples.
   1. Be sure to address this question: How can a system that claims to be unbiased and impartial allow interest group participation in the judicial process?
4. Use at least three (3) quality academic resources. Note: Wikipedia and other websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

• Detail the history and organization of the levels of the American court system and the issue of jurisdictional boundaries.

• Use technology and information resources to research issues in the criminal court and the judicial process in America.
• Write clearly and concisely about the American court system using proper writing mechanics and APA style conventions.

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 200	Assignment 1: Lawyers, Litigants, and Interest Groups in the Judicial Process
Criteria	Unacceptable Below 60% F	Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D	Fair 70-79% C	Proficient 80-89% B	Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Discuss the importance of lawyers in American society and government. Be specific and provide examples. Address question 1a: Why have lawyers, from the early colonial years to the present, been so unpopular? Weight: 30%	Did not submit or incompletely discussed the importance of lawyers in American society and government. Did not provide examples. Did not address question 1a.	Insufficiently discussed the importance of lawyers in American society and government. Provided insufficient examples. Insufficiently addressed question 1a.	Partially discussed the importance of lawyers in American society and government. Provided partial examples. Only partially addressed question 1a.	Satisfactorily discussed the importance of lawyers in American society and government. Provided examples. Addressed question 1a.	Thoroughly discussed the importance of lawyers in American society and government. Provided specific examples. Thoroughly addressed question 1a.
2. Describe the impact of stratification within the legal profession as it relates to the delivery and quality of legal services in the United States. Be specific and provide examples. Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletely described the impact of stratification within the legal profession as it relates to the delivery and quality of legal services in the United States. Did not provide examples.	Insufficiently described the impact of stratification within the legal profession as it relates to the delivery and quality of legal services in the United States. Provided insufficient examples.	Partially described the impact of stratification within the legal profession as it relates to the delivery and quality of legal services in the United States. Provided partial examples.	Satisfactorily described the impact of stratification within the legal profession as it relates to the delivery and quality of legal services in the United States. Provided examples.	Thoroughly described the impact of stratification within the legal profession as it relates to the delivery and quality of legal services in the United States. Provided specific examples.
3. Examine the role of interest groups in the judicial process. Be specific and provide examples. Address question 3a. Weight: 25%	Did not examine the role of interest groups in the judicial process. Did not provide examples. Did not address question 3a.	Insufficiently examined the role of interest groups in the judicial process. Provided insufficient examples. Insufficiently addressed question 3a.	Partially examined the role of interest groups in the judicial process. Provided partial examples. Only partially addressed question 3a.	Satisfactorily examined the role of interest groups in the judicial process. Provided examples. Addressed question 3a.	Thoroughly examined the role of interest groups in the judicial process. Provided specific examples. Thoroughly addressed question 3a.
4. 3 references Weight: 10%	No references provided	Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.	Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.	Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.	Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
5. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 15%	More than 8 errors present	7-8 errors present	5-6 errors present	3-4 errors present	0-2 errors present