This is an assignment to write around 10 pages lab report for Bio 2 by making fly culture vials, with some calculations. All the information that are needed are going to be in the files. If there is anything else that is missing contact me.
Discuss the elements of Hades’ interactions with the dead in the underworld. Consider the geography of the underworld and the true role of Hades. How are concepts of Tartarus (for the ancient Greeks) equivalent to contemporary notions of hell in YOUR opinion?
Your response must contain at least 3-4 well-developed paragraphs. All work must be in complete sentences and properly cited
The United States is a nation of many races, ethnicities, and nationalities. Many groups in this country have experienced discrimination. Think about discrimination you have experienced or witnessed and answer the following questions:
Select an author/poet/philosopher of your choice from the prepared list for your analytical research paper (700-750 words). Your paper consists of FOUR parts: I) the biography of the person with an emphasis on the most important events in his/her life especially those that might have influenced his/her writing (use at least TWO secondary sources); II) the points expressed by experts about the person’s writing styles/abilities, most important works, the scope of his/her influence on other writers, and other relevant features of his/her writing (use at least TWO secondary sources); III) your own personal analysis of the person’s writing: what are the main works or aspects of his/her works that you liked/disliked and what is your predictions about this person’s ability to relate to the future generations. If you wish, you can also interview some of our professors or other experts and seek their input as well; IV) A writing sample, e. g. a poem/stanzas/one page prose.
Format:
*MLA style
*You may switch your verb tenses as the direction of the paper determines the more appropriate tense(s).
*Use parenthetical documentation within the body of your paper the same way that you utilized the citation in your final research paper in ENG-102 class
*Use a separate Works Cited page and correctly include your sources *Avoid contractions and “youâ€, “weâ€, “usâ€, “Iâ€
*Do NOT exceed the maximum required 700-750 words
*Include the “Word Count†at the end of the paper, but exclude the Works Cited page
My topic is F. Scott Fitzgerald
Discuss the interaction of economics, demographics and political values and institutions in the shaping of the southern American colonies.
Length is between four and five double spaced, typed pages.
Beck Manufacturing Al Beck, president of Beck manufacturing, wants to determine the capacity of his facil- ity, which produces steering gears for auto manufacturers. He has asked you to sort through the data and determine the capacity of the system and how that capacity may be increased. The operation is a product layout that produces large numbers of nearly iden- tical products. The process includes milling, grinding, boring, drilling, and assembling, in that order. Each finished product requires one operation on each type of machine. For example, each finished part is processed on one of the five milling machines, one of the seven grinding machines, etc.
The facility runs two 8-hour shifts per day, with a third shift for maintenance. The indus- trial engineering department has provided you with the following data on present opera- tions. In addition, you have been told that assembly operations, while not unlimited, can be easily changed to meet the need.
Operations Number of Machines run time per piece
Milling 5 2
Grinding 7 3
Boring 3 1
Drilling 6 2.5
Your paper should be in paragraph form (avoid the use of bullet points) and supported with the concepts outlined as in the text with additional scholarly sources
Submit your three- to four-page paper (not including the title and reference pages). Your paper must be formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center and must cite at least three scholarly sources in addition to the textbook…..show ALLLL in text citations in the paper….APA FORMAT
I need help to solve one single mechanics problem. Look at the attached document. I ask for good answers, all the working out included in Word format.
From the e-Activity, recommend a short-term talent management strategy to get past the economic downturn and keep employees motivated until the market improves for both a domestic and multinational enterprise. Provide specific examples to support your response.
Question No. 1 Max. point 200Benchmark Assignment – Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection
Details:
This assignment requires you to interview one person and requires an analysis of your interview experience.
Part I: Interview
Select a patient, a family member, or a friend to interview. Be sure to focus on the interviewee’s experience as a patient, regardless of whom you choose to interview.
Review The Joint Commission resource found in topic materials, which provides some guidelines for creating spiritual assessment tools for evaluating the spiritual needs of patients. Using this resource and any other guidelines/examples that you can find, create your own tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients.
Your spiritual needs assessment survey must include a minimum of five questions that can be answered during the interview. During the interview, document the interviewee’s responses.
The transcript should include the questions asked and the answers provided. Be sure to record the responses during the interview by taking detailed notes. Omit specific names and other personal information through which the interviewee can be determined.
Part II: Analysis
Write a 500-750 word analysis of your interview experience. Be sure to exclude specific names and other personal information from the interview. Instead, provide demographics such as sex, age, ethnicity, and religion. Include the following in your response:
Submit both the transcript of the interview and the analysis of your results. This should be submitted as one document. The interview transcript does not figure into the word count.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
This benchmark assignment assesses the following competencies:
CONHCP Program Competencies for the RN-BSN:
5.2: Assess for the spiritual needs and provide appropriate interventions for individuals, families, and groups.
Benchmark Assignment – Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.0 %Content |
||||||
|
40.0 %Tool for Assessing the Spiritual Needs of Patients CONHCP: 5.2 |
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients show little to no relevance to the experiences of patients. A transcript of the interview is either missing or not relevant. |
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present but lacks focus on experiences of patients. A clear transcript of the interview is provided. |
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patients. A clear transcript of the interview is provided. |
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patient. The tool uses reliable methods for gathering data. A clear transcript of the interview is provided. |
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patients. The tool uses effective methods for gathering data that produces the results intended. A clear transcript of the interview is provided. |
|
|
30.0 %Analysis of Interview Experience |
An analysis of the interview experience shows little to no relevance to the assignment instructions. |
An analysis of the interview experience is included but addresses a few of the points included in the assignment instructions. |
An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses most of the points included in the assignment instructions. |
An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses all of the points included in the assignment instructions. |
An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses all of the points included in the assignment instructions. The analysis shows a deep understanding of the connections. |
|
|
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness |
||||||
|
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose |
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. |
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. |
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. |
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. |
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
|
|
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction |
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. |
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. |
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. |
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. |
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
|
|
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. |
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. |
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. |
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
|
|
10.0 %Format |
||||||
|
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) |
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. |
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. |
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. |
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. |
All format elements are correct. |
|
|
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) |
Sources are not documented. |
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. |
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. |
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. |
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
|
|
100 %Total Weightage |
||||||
Question No. 2 Case Study on Death and Dying – Max. points 200
Details:
The practice of health care providers at all levels brings you into contact with people from a variety of faiths. This calls for knowledge and acceptance of a diversity of faith expressions.
The purpose of this paper is to complete a comparative ethical analysis of George’s situation and decision from the perspective of two worldviews or religions: Christianity and a second religion of your choosing. For the second faith, choose a faith that is unfamiliar to you. Examples of faiths to choose from include Sikh, Baha’i, Buddhism, Shintoism, etc.
In your comparative analysis, address all of the worldview questions in detail for Christianity and your selected faith. Refer to Chapter 2 of Called to Care for the list of questions. Once you have outlined the worldview of each religion, begin your ethical analysis from each perspective.
In a minimum of 1,500-2,000 words, provide an ethical analysis based upon the different belief systems, reinforcing major themes with insights gained from your research, and answering the following questions based on the research:
Support your position by referencing at least three academic resources (preferably from the GCU Library) in addition to the course readings, lectures, the Bible, and the textbooks for each religion. Each religion must have a primary source included. A total of six references are required according to the specifications listed above. Incorporate the research into your writing in an appropriate, scholarly manner.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Case Study on Death and Dying
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.0 %Content |
||||||
|
20.0 %Identification of Ethical Issues as They Relate to the Four Principles of Principlism |
The ethical issues are incorrectly organized. |
Ethical issues are adequately organized according to the four principles of principlism. Some of the categorization is suspect. |
Ethical issues are organized according to the four principles of principlism. |
Ethical issues are organized according to the four principles of principlism. A distinction between the four principles is clearly stated, but the reasoning of the categorization is merely adequate. |
Ethical issues are organized according to the four principles of principlism. A distinction between the four principles and the reasoning of the categorization is clearly stated. |
|
|
20.0 %Description of the Christian Worldview and the Other Worldview |
The description of the Christian worldview and the selected worldview address little to none of the seven worldview questions and the description is mostly incorrect or irrelevant. |
The description of the Christian worldview and the selected worldview address most of the seven worldview questions with little evidence of a surface-level understanding. |
The description of the Christian worldview and the selected worldview adequately address all seven worldview questions, but the description has a surface-level understanding. |
The description of the Christian worldview and the selected worldview address all seven worldview questions with evidence of basic understanding utilizing a detailed description. |
The description of the Christian worldview and the selected worldview address all seven worldview questions with evidence of a deep understanding utilizing a detailed description. |
|
|
20.0 %Analysis of Ethical Issues through Christian Worldview and the Other Worldview |
The primary principles and values in the decision making process of each worldview have little to no relevance. Ethical reasoning seems to have no connection from the worldview considerations. |
The primary principles and values are acknowledged in the decision making process of each worldview. Ethical reasoning is loosely based from the worldview considerations. |
The primary principles and values surface in the decision making process of each worldview. Ethical reasoning is implied from the worldview considerations. |
The primary principles and values are recognized in the decision making process of each worldview. Ethical reasoning is explained from the worldview considerations. Most implications of the principles and values are given consideration. |
The primary principles and values are clearly distinguished in the decision making process of each worldview. Ethical reasoning is clearly delineated from the worldview considerations. The implications of the principles and values are given complete consideration. |
|
|
10.0 %Personal Recommendation |
The personal recommendation from the student’s worldview is stated, but the justification has little to no relevance. |
The personal recommendation from the student’s worldview is stated with proper justification. |
The personal recommendation from the student’s worldview is stated with proper justification with some implications explained. |
The personal recommendation from the student’s worldview is stated with proper justification. The primary principles of the student’s worldview are clearly described with most implications explained. |
The personal recommendation from the student’s worldview is stated with proper justification. The primary principles of the student’s worldview are clearly described with all implications explained. |
|
|
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness |
||||||
|
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose |
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. |
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. |
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. |
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. |
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
|
|
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction |
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. |
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. |
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. |
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. |
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
|
|
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. |
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. |
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. |
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
|
|
10.0 %Format |
||||||
|
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) |
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. |
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. |
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. |
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. |
All format elements are correct. |
|
|
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) |
Sources are not documented. |
Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. |
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. |
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. |
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
|
|
100 %Total Weightage |
||||||
